Damon and I were discussing an acquaintance and his dealings with the INS in regards to his green card. I said, “Affiliation with Oprah gives a person incredible credibility.” And then my brain turned inside out.
13 Jan
- Comment
- Reblog
-
Subscribe
Subscribed
Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
jaysaint 
Posted by travellight on January 14, 2008 at 1:21 am
I’m not sure what it means that I totally see what you’re saying.
Posted by travellight on January 14, 2008 at 1:21 am
I’m not sure what it means that I totally see what you’re saying.
Posted by jaysaint on January 17, 2008 at 2:58 am
I don’t know either, but I’m grateful.
Posted by jaysaint on January 17, 2008 at 2:58 am
I don’t know either, but I’m grateful.
Posted by jaysaint on January 17, 2008 at 2:58 am
I don’t know either, but I’m grateful.
Posted by jaysaint on January 17, 2008 at 2:58 am
I don’t know either, but I’m grateful.
Posted by jaysaint on January 17, 2008 at 2:58 am
I don’t know either, but I’m grateful.
Posted by jaysaint on January 17, 2008 at 2:58 am
I don’t know either, but I’m grateful.
Posted by travellight on January 14, 2008 at 1:21 am
I’m not sure what it means that I totally see what you’re saying.
Posted by travellight on January 14, 2008 at 1:21 am
I’m not sure what it means that I totally see what you’re saying.
Posted by travellight on January 14, 2008 at 1:21 am
I’m not sure what it means that I totally see what you’re saying.
Posted by travellight on January 14, 2008 at 1:21 am
I’m not sure what it means that I totally see what you’re saying.
Posted by travellight on January 14, 2008 at 1:21 am
I’m not sure what it means that I totally see what you’re saying.
Posted by galbinus_caeli on January 14, 2008 at 1:44 pm
Is any of that credibility affected by whether the affiliation in question involves sofa bouncing?
Posted by galbinus_caeli on January 14, 2008 at 1:44 pm
Is any of that credibility affected by whether the affiliation in question involves sofa bouncing?
Posted by Anonymous on January 14, 2008 at 3:48 pm
Hmmmm. I hadn’t accounted for that. Perhaps I spoke too soon!
Posted by Anonymous on January 14, 2008 at 3:48 pm
Hmmmm. I hadn’t accounted for that. Perhaps I spoke too soon!
Posted by Anonymous on January 14, 2008 at 3:48 pm
Hmmmm. I hadn’t accounted for that. Perhaps I spoke too soon!
Posted by Anonymous on January 14, 2008 at 3:48 pm
Hmmmm. I hadn’t accounted for that. Perhaps I spoke too soon!
Posted by Anonymous on January 14, 2008 at 3:48 pm
Hmmmm. I hadn’t accounted for that. Perhaps I spoke too soon!
Posted by Anonymous on January 14, 2008 at 3:48 pm
Hmmmm. I hadn’t accounted for that. Perhaps I spoke too soon!
Posted by galbinus_caeli on January 14, 2008 at 1:44 pm
Is any of that credibility affected by whether the affiliation in question involves sofa bouncing?
Posted by galbinus_caeli on January 14, 2008 at 1:44 pm
Is any of that credibility affected by whether the affiliation in question involves sofa bouncing?
Posted by galbinus_caeli on January 14, 2008 at 1:44 pm
Is any of that credibility affected by whether the affiliation in question involves sofa bouncing?
Posted by galbinus_caeli on January 14, 2008 at 1:44 pm
Is any of that credibility affected by whether the affiliation in question involves sofa bouncing?
Posted by galbinus_caeli on January 14, 2008 at 1:44 pm
Is any of that credibility affected by whether the affiliation in question involves sofa bouncing?
Posted by Anonymous on January 14, 2008 at 3:48 pm
Hmmmm. I hadn’t accounted for that. Perhaps I spoke too soon!
Posted by jaysaint on January 17, 2008 at 2:58 am
I don’t know either, but I’m grateful.